discovery · planning · development · QA · marketing
Without memory, AI is just chat.
With memory, it's a co-pilot that knows what we did yesterday.
/start-session
load project context
/checkpoint
snapshot progress before /compact
/end-session
summary + update project files
your-workspace/
├── CLAUDE.md ← root rules
├── .claude/
│ └── commands/ ← /start /checkpoint /end
├── vault/
│ ├── active-context.md ← current focus
│ ├── index.md ← master index
│ ├── session-logs/ ← session logs
│ └── projects/
│ ├── _templates/ ← empty templates
│ └── {project}/ ← overview · decisions · bugs · todo
└── {project}/ ← your code, next to vault
Trigger: 80-page regulatory PDF in Spanish. Deadline — 4 days. Three parallel projects already in flight.
Solve:
WebFetch on the official regulator pages → structured notes.Trigger: several engineering teams, each with its own tool for plans and commits. Stakeholders need a single view — everything in one place and easy to read.
Solve:
Trigger: migrating a legacy FE to a new stack + a backlog of UI tickets that's been growing for weeks.
Solve: thanks to solid service docs, AI reads the team's conventions — I just describe the business requirements and validate the result.
# conventions-from-review.md
- .input(z.object({...})) — always
- string ids; BigInt() at boundary
- mapper as namespace + function
- copyable: true on text columns
- access keys: provider_onboarding.*
Trigger: 10 minutes after an approved transaction, the status flips to REVERSED.
It happened once today — that's potentially 1000 such flips tomorrow.
Solve: I propose a hypothesis. AI connects over MCP to the relevant sources, reads payload logs, correlates, confirms. In the same session — it writes acceptance criteria for the fix ticket.
Every product launch leaves a trail: a Slack announcement, a docs page, a release card. 10+ PMs, 5+ active streams — same friction every time: blank page, inconsistent voice, copy-paste from the spec.
We built a team-shared skill, not a prompt — /product-release-card. Reads the feature spec. Drafts against our canonical template. The team reviews collectively — catches hallucinated industries, invented archetypes, lines that don't sound like us. The skill gets versioned. Next launch uses the improved version.
Golden rule: AI is flawless where there are "quality" examples. Blind trust = expensive mistakes.
…but only on three pillars.
linkedin.com/in/yehor-myroshnychenko